Image Credit: Licensed under the Unsplash+ License
In an age of rapid content consumption, shrinking attention spans, and instant gratification, Slow Cinema stands as a radical act of defiance. Defined by its long takes, minimal dialogue, and meditative pacing, this filmmaking style resists the pressures of modern storytelling, by refusing to cater for an audience conditioned by TikTok, Instagram Reels, and streaming algorithms that prioritises speed and engagement over depth and patience. Moreover, a growing number of Gen Z viewers are turning to this form of cinema—not despite its slowness, but because of it.
As Hollywood intensifies its editing pace and social media reduces storytelling to fleeting moments, Slow Cinema offers a rare alternative, an opportunity to pause, observe, and fully engage with the passage of time. The question is no longer whether these films can survive in a world that moves faster than ever, but rather why said films are gaining traction amongst a generation raised on speed. Recent studies show that Gen Z’s video consumption habits are shifting toward intentional, mindful viewing, moving away from traditional binge-watching.”
Mayed Qasimi, a Film director exploring the boundaries of modern storytelling, has dedicated his work to crafting films that challenge the expectation of rapid engagement. Andrés de Arriaga, a producer whose projects embrace stillness and introspection, believes Slow Cinema provides an emotional depth that is often lost in mainstream entertainment. Samuel Cristo, a 16-year-old cinephile, has discovered that patience in storytelling is not a weakness but a skill, one that young audiences may be more prepared to embrace than people assume. Through their perspectives, the relevance of this cinematic movement in an age of overstimulation becomes clearer, revealing a countercultural shift that values stillness as much as movement.
This growing interest in unhurried, meditative storytelling raises an important question: is it a rejection of digital oversaturation, or a quiet rebellion against a world that no longer allows space for contemplation? The answer may lie in how these films are being consumed, not in isolation, but as part of a growing movement toward mindful entertainment, a term increasingly used to describe deliberate viewing habits that contrast with the algorithm-driven binge culture of modern streaming platforms.
Qasimi understands the challenge of creating contemplative cinema in an industry that thrives on immediacy. For him, Slow Cinema is not just a technical choice but a philosophy. His work prioritises long, immersive shots that invite the audience to linger, forcing them to engage with the image rather than passively absorb a rapidly edited sequence.
“Slowness isn’t just about how long a shot lasts,” he explains. “It’s about allowing time to unfold naturally, rather than forcing a rhythm dictated by short attention spans. When you hold a shot for longer than expected, you change the way people watch. You make them aware of time in a way they’re not used to.”
He points to the works of Apichatpong Weerasethakul and Abbas Kiarostami, filmmakers whose long, poetic storytelling defies the conventional pacing of commercial cinema. In Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives, Weerasethakul uses extended takes and a dreamlike structure to blur the line between reality and memory. Kiarostami’s Taste of Cherry places the viewer in long stretches of silence, forcing an engagement with the film’s existential themes that would be lost in a more rapidly edited piece. These films are not simply slow for the sake of it; they use time as a storytelling device, requiring the audience to meet them on their own terms.
For Qasimi, the appeal of Slow Cinema to younger audiences is a response to exhaustion. The endless stream of fast content, algorithm-driven recommendations, and digital distractions has created an overstimulated culture in which many feel the need to reclaim their ability to focus. Slowness, in this context, becomes not just an aesthetic choice but a radical alternative to modern viewing habits.
Arriaga sees Slow Cinema as more than just a reaction to overstimulation; he views it as a global storytelling language, one that allows filmmakers to engage with history, culture, and human emotion in a way that transcends borders. His upcoming projects explore themes of spirituality and historical introspection, weaving narratives that unfold slowly and deliberately.
“These films exist outside of conventional storytelling structures,” he explains. “They give space to the things that mainstream cinema often overlooks, landscapes, silence, the weight of a single moment.”
He believes that Slow Cinema is not fading but rather being rediscovered by audiences seeking authenticity. At a time when streaming platforms prioritise engagement metrics and viewer retention strategies, there remains a niche for films that resist mainstream conventions. The renewed popularity of vinyl records and the increasing trend of digital detoxing suggest that audiences are willing to embrace media that requires patience.”
Gen Z’s appreciation for Slow Cinema may not be as unlikely as it seems. While they are often perceived as a generation with short attention spans, many young people are actively looking for content that prioritises depth over immediacy.
Sixteen-year-old Samuel Cristo represents a new wave of cinephiles who are discovering Slow Cinema as an antidote to digital noise. Community discussions suggest that younger audiences are embracing films that challenge conventional pacing. He describes his initial struggle with the genre, admitting that his first attempt to watch Andrei Tarkovsky’s Stalker was frustrating. Accustomed to the fast pacing of contemporary films, he found himself restless, waiting for something to happen. But as the film continued, he realized that the stillness itself was the point.
“I started noticing things I wouldn’t normally pay attention to,” he says. “The way light moves in a scene, the quiet expressions on people’s faces, the details in the background that would have been cut in a faster film. It was like my brain had to adjust to a new way of watching.”
For Cristo, Slow Cinema has become more than just a challenge, it is a deliberate choice. In a world where distractions are constant, he sees it as an exercise in patience and mindfulness.
“It’s like breaking a habit,” he explains. “At first, you crave the fast cuts and the constant stimulation. But once you get used to stillness, it feels like you’re seeing films in a completely different way. You become more present.”
The endurance of Slow Cinema suggests that it offers something modern audiences still need, a space for contemplation, a break from the hyperactive rhythms of digital culture, and an opportunity to experience time differently.
Mayed Qasimi believes that, if fast content dominates, there will always be those who crave its opposite.
“It’s like music,” he says. “Fast songs will always be popular, but that doesn’t mean people stop listening to jazz or classical music. Different moods require different rhythms. Cinema is the same way.”
For de Arriaga, the challenge is ensuring that these films remain accessible to new audiences. With streaming platforms increasingly prioritising content designed for maximum engagement, there is a risk that slower films will become harder to find. Industry experts warn that slow films may struggle to reach mass audiences in a system built on binge culture.
“There’s an audience for this,” he says. “The question is whether the industry will make space for it.”
Cristo, as part of the next generation of cinephiles, believes that Slow Cinema is not just a genre but an invitation.
“It’s an invitation to watch differently, to actually see rather than just look,” he says. “And I think more people are ready for that than we realise.”
Whether Slow Cinema will thrive in a world that moves faster than ever remains uncertain. Cinematic theorists argue that films embracing time and perception will always have an enduring appeal.