The return of the 2000s digicam

Once a relic of the early 2000s, the compact digital camera has become a defining accessory for Gen Z, shaping how the next generation documents its life. At Goldsmiths, University of London, photography lecturers Ivan Coleman and David Ramkalawon, both practising documentary photographers with over 30 years of experience, have seen this shift up close. In this interview, they reflect on the return of the digicam, the appeal of imperfection, and the undeniable pull of the past. “Nostalgia is cyclical,” Coleman says. “You live long enough, you see it all come back.”

Ivan Coleman (left) and David Ramkalawon (right) | Image credit: Paridhi Dalmia

Coleman: Before digital really broke through, the cameras were extremely expensive. You remember the old Kodak and Nikon ones. They were considered out of reach for most people. It was only when the Canon D30 came in that we thought, “This is a camera we can actually use”. Suddenly, you started reconsidering film because it was just easier to use. It saved money on processing, and you could deliver images to clients almost instantaneously. It was a revelation.

Ramkalawon: Digital cameras changed that completely. In news gathering, you’re not looking for the best. You’re looking for the fastest. Good enough is good enough, as long as it’s fast. 

Ramkalawon: Students also like the imperfections. They want to use the darkroom because it isn’t perfect. They want black and white prints that feel physical. It’s taken us a while to get our heads around that because when we were learning, the goal was always to make the best possible image. They want the “roll-off”, where the brightest parts of the image bloom instead of just turning into empty white pixels. It mimics how our eyes actually see. They verbalise it as a reaction against AI. They want something physical, something hand-processed. 

Image credit: Creative Commons

Coleman: Nostalgia is cyclical. Once you get past 40, you start seeing fashions come back. I’ve already seen the 1980s return twice. People reach their twenties and start thinking everything from the past was cooler, especially if they didn’t experience it the first time.

Ramkalawon: Part of it now is that the future feels pretty uncertain for a lot of people. The 1990s especially felt like a moment when everything seemed okay. Maybe it’s just easier, or even safer, to look back.

What is the difference between taking pictures on a digital camera vs on a smartphone? 

Ramkalawon: One difference is simply holding a camera up to your face. That changes how people react. When someone raises a phone, everyone immediately knows they’re filming. A camera feels different.

Coleman: Smartphones have actually made physical cameras less threatening. Now people are more suspicious of phones because they assume the image might end up online. A lot of that is about how attached smartphones are to social media. Both take pictures, but they don’t feel the same. And the irony is, smartphones have never been better. You’ve got 4K, 24, and 48 megapixel cameras. You could do everything on your phone. But it’s almost that ubiquity that makes people want something different.

Ramkalawon: It’s a trend. Before this, compact film cameras were fashionable. Influencers posted photos with them, and suddenly the prices shot up. A lot of it comes from social media, and it becomes another kind of flavour, almost like choosing a filter. People get to a point where they think everyone’s using the same thing, so they start looking for something cooler. 

Coleman: I can already predict what’s next. The Canon 5D and panorama cameras will probably come back around.

He points to the words of the American street photographer Garry Winogrand: “It’s exciting to see what the world looks like in a picture.”

Coleman: Look at real prints on gallery walls. Put your phone down. Photographs on a wall are completely different from images on a screen. Everything on a phone is transmitted light; a print is reflected light, like a painting. If anything should become fashionable again, it’s making prints.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *